In early 2025, a federal court blocked the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) new overtime rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), preventing it from going into effect as scheduled. The rule was designed to expand overtime pay protections to an estimated 4 million additional workers by raising the salary threshold for exemption.
Supporters viewed it as a critical update to labor law in an era of rising living costs, while opponents argued that it placed excessive financial strain on employers.
The court’s decision represents a major setback for wage reform. While the rule’s future remains uncertain, pending appeals and possible revisions, its immediate suspension leaves millions of workers ineligible for overtime pay they might otherwise have received in 2025.
What the 2025 Overtime Rule Proposed
The blocked regulation sought to adjust the salary threshold for overtime eligibility under the FLSA.
Currently, many salaried workers are classified as “exempt” from overtime if they meet certain criteria. The 2025 rule would have raised the salary cutoff, making more employees eligible.
Key Proposed Changes
| Provision | Previous Standard (2024) | Proposed 2025 Rule | Estimated Impact |
| Salary threshold for exempt employees | $35,568 annually | $55,068 annually | +4 million eligible workers |
| Highly compensated employee threshold | $107,432 annually | $143,988 annually | Expands coverage |
| Automatic updates | None | Every 3 years, based on wage growth | Prevents stagnation |
Had the rule taken effect, millions of lower- and mid-level managers, supervisors, and professional employees would have become eligible for time-and-a-half pay when working over 40 hours a week.
Why the Court Blocked the Rule
The court ruling focused on several legal and economic challenges:
- Exceeding Regulatory Authority – Critics argued the Department of Labor lacked authority to raise the salary threshold so dramatically without congressional approval.
- Economic Burden on Employers – Business groups claimed the rule would increase payroll costs significantly, particularly for small businesses, nonprofits, and organizations in low-wage regions.
- Disruption to Business Models – Opponents warned that employers might reduce hours, reclassify positions, or cut staff to avoid higher labor costs.
- Precedent from 2016 – A similar Obama-era rule was also struck down by a federal court in Texas in 2016, which cited comparable concerns.
While worker advocates emphasized fairness and modernizing wage standards, the court sided with employer groups in halting the rule before implementation.
Impact on U.S. Workers
The immediate effect is clear: millions of workers who expected to qualify for overtime pay in 2025 remain exempt. This disproportionately affects mid-level employees who often work long hours without additional compensation.
| Worker Category | Typical Salary Range | Status Without New Rule | Projected Status With Rule |
| Retail managers | $40,000–$52,000 | Exempt | Eligible |
| Social service coordinators | $38,000–$48,000 | Exempt | Eligible |
| Entry-level engineers | $42,000–$55,000 | Exempt (varies) | Eligible |
| Nonprofit administrators | $36,000–$50,000 | Exempt | Eligible |
This means employees in industries like retail, food service, healthcare, education, and nonprofits, where longer hours are common, are more vulnerable to unpaid overtime.
Economic and Social Implications
The decision to block the overtime expansion carries significant consequences not only for individual workers but also for the broader economy. One of the most immediate effects is wage stagnation.
Employees in industries where 50–60-hour workweeks are common, such as retail, food service, healthcare, and nonprofits, will continue earning the same fixed salaries without additional compensation for the extra hours they put in. This means fewer opportunities for workers to increase their take-home pay, even as living costs continue to rise.
The ruling also affects work-life balance. Overtime protections serve as a natural check on excessive scheduling by making it more costly for employers to require long hours. Without expanded eligibility, companies face little financial incentive to limit workloads, which may lead to burnout, higher turnover, and reduced overall job satisfaction.
Another major concern is income inequality. Overtime protections typically benefit lower- and middle-income earners the most, since they are the ones most likely to fall just above the old salary threshold.
By leaving the exemption cutoff unchanged, the ruling reinforces existing disparities, widening the gap between higher-paid professionals and workers who shoulder long hours without extra pay.
On the other hand, employers, particularly small businesses and nonprofits, gain short-term relief from avoiding a sudden increase in payroll expenses. Advocates for businesses argue this helps preserve jobs and maintain financial stability in organizations that operate with thin margins.
Still, the broader economic picture suggests that workers lose more than employers gain.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, the blocked rule would have shifted roughly $1.2 billion in wages annually into workers’ pockets. Instead, those funds remain with employers, highlighting the trade-off between business cost savings and the financial security of millions of employees.
Criticism and Support
Reactions to the court’s decision have been polarized:
- Worker Advocates: Labor unions, worker rights groups, and progressive lawmakers condemned the ruling, arguing it undermines basic labor protections in an era when productivity gains outpace wage growth.
- Employers and Trade Associations: Many business groups praised the decision, framing it as necessary to avoid cost shocks and preserve operational flexibility.
- Legal Experts: Some analysts suggest the DOL may revise the rule to lower the salary threshold increase or remove automatic updates, making it more likely to withstand judicial scrutiny.
Looking Ahead: What Comes Next?
The Department of Labor is expected to appeal the ruling, but the outcome may take months or years to resolve. In the meantime, workers remain under the old threshold of $35,568 per year, first set in 2019.
Some states, however, have already implemented their own higher thresholds. For example:
| State | Salary Threshold (2025) | Overtime Expansion |
| California | $66,560 | Among the highest in the nation |
| New York | $58,500 (downstate) | Expanded coverage |
| Washington | $65,480 | Broad protections |
These state-level actions demonstrate a growing divide in worker protections depending on geography.
Employees in states without additional rules will see no change, while those in states like California or New York enjoy stronger safeguards regardless of the federal court ruling.
Conclusion
View this post on Instagram
The blocking of the FLSA Overtime Rule 2025 leaves millions of U.S. workers ineligible for pay protections that many labor advocates considered long overdue. While employers have avoided a sudden increase in labor costs, the ruling highlights the ongoing tension between economic competitiveness and worker fairness.
At the same time, proposals like the Paycheck Fairness Act show how wage equity and broader labor protections remain central in the policy conversation.
The debate is far from over. With appeals pending and state-level reforms moving forward, the future of overtime protections remains uncertain.
What is clear, however, is that the question of who qualifies for overtime and how much workers should be compensated for long hours will remain a defining labor issue in 2025 and beyond.
