The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a U.S. federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability in programs and activities conducted by federal agencies, receiving federal financial assistance, or carried out by federal contractors.
In practical terms, it requires the federal government and federally funded entities to provide equal access, reasonable accommodations, and nondiscriminatory treatment to qualified individuals with disabilities.
It is the first major federal statute to establish disability rights in the United States and remains a core enforcement framework today.
Why the Rehabilitation Act Was Created and What Problem It Addressed
Before 1973, people with disabilities faced routine exclusion from public employment, education, healthcare, transportation, and federally funded services, often without any formal legal recourse. Disability was commonly treated as a medical or charitable issue rather than a civil rights issue.
Congress passed the Rehabilitation Act in response to growing evidence that systemic barriers, not individual impairments, were the primary reason people with disabilities were denied work, education, and participation in public life.
The Act reframed disability as a matter of equal opportunity. Its focus was not on treating or fixing individuals, but on removing discriminatory practices, inaccessible environments, and biased eligibility rules.
This shift later became the conceptual foundation for the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, but the Rehabilitation Act came first and established the legal logic that disability discrimination is unlawful when public funds or federal authority are involved.
Who Is Protected Under the Rehabilitation Act
Protection under the Rehabilitation Act applies to “qualified individuals with disabilities.” This phrase has a specific legal meaning and is narrower than casual usage.
A person must have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, have a record of such an impairment, or be regarded as having such an impairment.
In addition, the person must meet the essential eligibility requirements for the program, service, or job in question, with or without reasonable accommodation.
Major life activities include walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, communicating, and working, as well as major bodily functions such as neurological, immune, or endocrine system operations.
Temporary, minor conditions generally do not qualify, while long-term or episodic conditions such as multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, diabetes, PTSD, and major depressive disorder often do, depending on severity and functional impact.
Scope of Coverage: Where the Law Applies
The Rehabilitation Act does not apply universally to all private entities. Its reach is tied to federal involvement.
It applies in three primary contexts: federal agencies, organizations receiving federal financial assistance, and federal contractors.
| Covered Entity Type | Examples | Legal Basis |
| Federal agencies | SSA, VA, Department of Education, NIH | Section 501 |
| Federally funded programs | Public universities, Medicaid providers, public transit systems | Section 504 |
| Federal contractors | Defense contractors, IT vendors, construction firms | Section 503 |
This structure means that a private hospital receiving Medicare or Medicaid funds is covered, while a purely private business with no federal ties may not be, unless other disability laws apply.
In practice, federal funding is widespread, which gives the Rehabilitation Act a broad real-world reach.
Section 504: The Core Anti-Discrimination Provision
Section 504 is the most widely applied and litigated part of the Rehabilitation Act. It states that no qualified individual with a disability may be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
This provision affects education, healthcare, housing, transportation, and social services. Public schools and universities must provide reasonable academic adjustments. Hospitals must ensure accessible facilities and nondiscriminatory care. Social service agencies must modify policies that unnecessarily screen out people with disabilities.
A key feature of Section 504 is that discrimination does not require intent. A policy that appears neutral on its face can still violate the law if it disproportionately excludes people with disabilities and lacks a legitimate justification.
In the education context, Section 504 often operates alongside other special education frameworks, which makes understanding 504 plans and IEPs important for families and educators navigating disability protections in schools.
While both tools aim to ensure equal access, a Section 504 plan typically focuses on accommodations that allow a student with a disability to participate in general education, such as extended test time or classroom modifications, whereas an Individualized Education Program involves specialized instruction under a different legal statute.
The Rehabilitation Act provides the legal foundation for 504 plans, making them enforceable civil rights protections rather than discretionary school supports.
Section 501: Federal Employment Protections
Section 501 applies specifically to federal employment. It requires federal agencies to engage in affirmative action for the hiring, placement, and advancement of individuals with disabilities.
Unlike private employers under later laws, federal agencies have proactive obligations, not just a duty to avoid discrimination.
Federal agencies must develop disability hiring plans, track workforce representation, and provide reasonable accommodations unless doing so would cause undue hardship.
In recent years, this has included targeted hiring authorities such as Schedule A, which allows qualified applicants with disabilities to be hired non-competitively into federal positions.
Section 503: Federal Contractors and Employment
View this post on Instagram
Section 503 applies to private employers with federal contracts exceeding specific monetary thresholds. These contractors must take affirmative steps to recruit, hire, retain, and promote individuals with disabilities.
Regulations enforced by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs set a national utilization goal of 7 percent representation of individuals with disabilities in each job group.
While this goal is not a quota, contractors must analyze barriers, improve outreach, and document good-faith efforts if they fall short. Failure to comply can result in audits, corrective action plans, and loss of federal contracts.
Reasonable Accommodations and Accessibility Requirements
The Rehabilitation Act requires reasonable accommodations to enable equal access and participation. Accommodations vary by context and are determined on a case-by-case basis.
| Context | Common Accommodations |
| Employment | Modified work schedules, assistive technology, and job restructuring |
| Education | Extended exam time, note-taking support, and accessible materials |
| Healthcare | Sign language interpreters, accessible exam equipment |
| Digital services | Screen-reader compatible websites, captioned videos |
An accommodation is considered unreasonable only if it imposes an undue financial or administrative burden or fundamentally alters the nature of the program. Cost alone is not sufficient unless it is excessive relative to the entity’s resources.
Digital Accessibility and Section 508
@asqrgroupContinuous Section 508 compliance isn’t just a checkbox – it’s mission-critical for federal digital services. Neglecting accessibility risks costly lawsuits, public backlash, and operational disruptions. But staying compliant is complex as standards and technologies evolve rapidly. Here’s how federal agencies can achieve ongoing compliance with confidence: • Conduct regular accessibility audits to catch issues early • Integrate accessibility into development with expert remediation • Train your teams on evolving accessibility standards • Employ assistive technology testing to ensure real-world usability • Maintain clear documentation for audits and reporting • Use continuous monitoring tools to stay ahead of changes At A Square Group, we specialize in federal-focused, scalable 508 compliance solutions that protect your mission and empower all users. Partner with experts who combine deep federal expertise, advanced technology, and a compliance-first mindset to keep your digital services accessible, secure, and mission-ready – every day.♬ original sound A Square Group (ASG)
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act addresses electronic and information technology used by the federal government.
It requires that federal websites, software, documents, and digital services be accessible to people with disabilities, including those who use screen readers, voice recognition software, or alternative input devices.
This provision has become increasingly important as government services move online. Inaccessibility of digital systems can constitute discrimination even when physical access is otherwise provided.
Section 508 standards align closely with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and have influenced accessibility practices beyond government.
Enforcement and Remedies
Enforcement of the Rehabilitation Act is shared among multiple agencies, depending on the context. Complaints can be filed with federal funding agencies, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or pursued through federal court.
Available remedies include injunctive relief, policy changes, back pay, compensatory damages in some cases, and termination of federal funding for noncompliant entities. Punitive damages are not available under Section 504, which reflects the law’s emphasis on compliance and access rather than punishment.
Relationship to the Americans with Disabilities Act
The Rehabilitation Act predates and influenced the Americans with Disabilities Act, but the two laws operate together. The ADA expanded disability protections to most private employers, public accommodations, and state and local governments regardless of federal funding.
However, the Rehabilitation Act remains independently enforceable and often applies where the ADA does not.
| Feature | Rehabilitation Act | ADA |
| Year enacted | 1973 | 1990 |
| Federal funding required | Yes | No |
| Applies to federal agencies | Yes | Limited |
| Digital accessibility mandate | Explicit (Section 508) | Indirect |
Courts often interpret the two laws consistently, but compliance with one does not automatically guarantee compliance with the other.
Ongoing Relevance and Modern Impact
More than fifty years after its passage, the Rehabilitation Act continues to shape access to education, employment, healthcare, and digital services for millions of Americans.
Its principles underpin modern disability rights enforcement, particularly in federally funded systems such as public universities, hospitals, and social service programs.
As technology, remote work, and online government services expand, the Act’s requirements have gained renewed importance. Accessibility failures increasingly involve software, data systems, and automated processes rather than physical barriers alone.
The Rehabilitation Act remains a central legal tool for addressing those challenges where federal authority or funding is involved.
Bottom Line
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is the foundation of disability civil rights law in the United States.
It protects qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination by federal agencies, federally funded programs, and federal contractors, requiring equal access, reasonable accommodations, and accessible systems.
Its influence extends far beyond its original scope, shaping how disability rights are understood, enforced, and implemented across modern public life.
